4.8 Article

Towards resolving the transcription factor network controlling myelin gene expression

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 18, 页码 7974-7991

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr326

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR)
  3. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
  4. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique, France
  5. Genome Quebec and Genome Canada 'GRID' program
  6. Multiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation
  7. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  8. Canada Foundation for Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the central nervous system (CNS), myelin is produced from spirally-wrapped oligodendrocyte plasma membrane and, as exemplified by the debilitating effects of inherited or acquired myelin abnormalities in diseases such as multiple sclerosis, it plays a critical role in nervous system function. Myelin sheath production coincides with rapid up-regulation of numerous genes. The complexity of their subsequent expression patterns, along with recently recognized heterogeneity within the oligodendrocyte lineage, suggest that the regulatory networks controlling such genes drive multiple context-specific transcriptional programs. Conferring this nuanced level of control likely involves a large repertoire of interacting transcription factors (TFs). Here, we combined novel strategies of computational sequence analyses with in vivo functional analysis to establish a TF network model of coordinate myelin-associated gene transcription. Notably, the network model captures regulatory DNA elements and TFs known to regulate oligodendrocyte myelin gene transcription and/or oligodendrocyte development, thereby validating our approach. Further, it links to numerous TFs with previously unsuspected roles in CNS myelination and suggests collaborative relationships amongst both known and novel TFs, thus providing deeper insight into the myelin gene transcriptional network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据