4.8 Article

Whole-transcriptome RNAseq analysis from minute amount of total RNA

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr547

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08B47A, NNX10AQ16A, NNX11AD38G]
  2. National Institutes of Health [P01-35HG000205]
  3. National Cancer Institute [U54CA143803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RNA sequencing approaches to transcriptome analysis require a large amount of input total RNA to yield sufficient mRNA using either poly-A selection or depletion of rRNA. This feature makes it difficult to miniaturize transcriptome analysis for greater efficiency. To address this challenge, we devised and validated a simple procedure for the preparation of whole-transcriptome cDNA libraries from a minute amount (500 pg) of total RNA. We compared a single-sample library prepared by this Ovation (R) RNA-Seq system with two available methods of mRNA enrichment (TruSeq (TM) poly-A enrichment and RiboMinus (TM) rRNA depletion). Using the Ovation (R) preparation method for a set of eight mouse tissue samples, the RNA sequencing data obtained from two different next-generation sequencing platforms (SOLiD and Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx) yielded negligible rRNA reads (< 3.5%) while retaining transcriptome sequencing fidelity. We further validated the Ovation (R) amplification technique by examining the resulting library complexity, reproducibility, evenness of transcript coverage, 5' and 3' bias and platform-specific biases. Notably, in this side-by-side comparison, SOLiD sequencing chemistry is biased toward higher GC content of transcriptome and Illumina Genome analyzer IIx is biased away from neutral to lower GC content of the transcriptomics regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据