4.8 Article

Why barcode? High-throughput multiplex sequencing of mitochondrial genomes for molecular systematics

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq807

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural History Museum
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F006225/1]
  3. Leverhulme Trust [F/00696/P]
  4. BBSRC [BB/H023534/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. NERC [NE/F006225/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H023534/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F006225/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial genome sequences are important markers for phylogenetics but taxon sampling remains sporadic because of the great effort and cost required to acquire full-length sequences. Here, we demonstrate a simple, cost-effective way to sequence the full complement of protein coding mitochondrial genes from pooled samples using the 454/Roche platform. Multiplexing was achieved without the need for expensive indexing tags ('barcodes'). The method was trialled with a set of long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments from 30 species of Coleoptera (beetles) sequenced in a 1/16th sector of a sequencing plate. Long contigs were produced from the pooled sequences with sequencing depths ranging from similar to 10 to 100x per contig. Species identity of individual contigs was established via three 'bait' sequences matching disparate parts of the mitochondrial genome obtained by conventional PCR and Sanger sequencing. This proved that assembly of contigs from the sequencing pool was correct. Our study produced sequences for 21 nearly complete and seven partial sets of protein coding mitochondrial genes. Combined with existing sequences for 25 taxa, an improved estimate of basal relationships in Coleoptera was obtained. The procedure could be employed routinely for mitochondrial genome sequencing at the species level, to provide improved species 'barcodes' that currently use the cox1 gene only.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据