4.8 Article

Mutations in the intersubunit bridge regions of 16S rRNA affect decoding and subunit-subunit interactions on the 70S ribosome

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 8, 页码 3321-3330

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq1253

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB0745025]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland
  3. University College Cork, Ireland
  4. School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri-Kansas City
  5. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [0745025] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The small and large subunits of the ribosome are held together by a series of bridges, involving RNA-RNA, RNA-protein and protein-protein interactions. Some 12 bridges have been described for the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome. In this work, we have targeted for mutagenesis, some of the 16S rRNA residues involved in the formation of intersubunit bridges B3, B5, B6, B7b and B8. In addition to effects on subunit association, the mutant ribosomes also affect the fidelity of translation; bridges B5, B6 and B8 increase decoding errors during elongation, while disruption of bridges B3 and B7b alters the stringency of start codon selection. Moreover, mutations in the bridge B5, B6 and B8 regions of 16S rRNA also correct the growth and decoding defects associated with alterations in ribosomal protein S12. These results link bridges B5, B6 and B8 with the decoding process and are consistent with the recently described location of translation factor EF-Tu on the ribosome and the proposed involvement of h14 in activating Guanosine-5'-triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis by aminoacyl-tRNA center dot EF-Tu center dot GTP. These observations are consistent with a model in which bridges B5, B6 and B8 contribute to the fidelity of translation by modulating GTP hydrolysis by aminoacyl-tRNA center dot EF-Tu center dot GTP ternary complexes during the elongation phase of protein synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据