4.8 Article

MiRNA-miRNA synergistic network: construction via co-regulating functional modules and disease miRNA topological features

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 825-836

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq832

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30600367, 30871394, 30571034]
  2. National High Tech Development Project of China
  3. 863 Program [2007AA02Z329]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China
  5. 973 Program [2008CB517302]
  6. National Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [ZJG0501, 1055HG009, GB03C602-4, BMFH060044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synergistic regulations among multiple microRNAs (miRNAs) are important to understand the mechanisms of complex post-transcriptional regulations in humans. Complex diseases are affected by several miRNAs rather than a single miRNA. So, it is a challenge to identify miRNA synergism and thereby further determine miRNA functions at a system-wide level and investigate disease miRNA features in the miRNA-miRNA synergistic network from a new view. Here, we constructed a miRNA-miRNA functional synergistic network (MFSN) via co-regulating functional modules that have three features: common targets of corresponding miRNA pairs, enriched in the same gene ontology category and close proximity in the protein interaction network. Predicted miRNA synergism is validated by significantly high co-expression of functional modules and significantly negative regulation to functional modules. We found that the MFSN exhibits a scale free, small world and modular architecture. Furthermore, the topological features of disease miRNAs in the MFSN are distinct from non-disease miRNAs. They have more synergism, indicating their higher complexity of functions and are the global central cores of the MFSN. In addition, miRNAs associated with the same disease are close to each other. The structure of the MFSN and the features of disease miRNAs are validated to be robust using different miRNA target data sets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据