4.8 Article

The UCSC cancer genomics browser: update 2011

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 D951-D959

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq1113

关键词

-

资金

  1. UCSC Genome Browser
  2. National Cancer Institute [TCGA 5R21CA135937-02, 5U24CA143858-02, 3U24CA143858-02S1]
  3. Stand Up To Cancer
  4. California Institute of Quantitative Biosciences
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R21CA135937, U24CA143858] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The UCSC Cancer Genomics Browser (https://genome-cancer.ucsc.edu) comprises a suite of web-based tools to integrate, visualize and analyze cancer genomics and clinical data. The browser displays whole-genome views of genome-wide experimental measurements for multiple samples alongside their associated clinical information. Multiple data sets can be viewed simultaneously as coordinated 'heatmap tracks' to compare across studies or different data modalities. Users can order, filter, aggregate, classify and display data interactively based on any given feature set including clinical features, annotated biological pathways and user-contributed collections of genes. Integrated standard statistical tools provide dynamic quantitative analysis within all available data sets. The browser hosts a growing body of publicly available cancer genomics data from a variety of cancer types, including data generated from the Cancer Genome Atlas project. Multiple consortiums use the browser on confidential prepublication data enabled by private installations. Many new features have been added, including the hgMicroscope tumor image viewer, hgSignature for real-time genomic signature evaluation on any browser track, and 'PARADIGM' pathway tracks to display integrative pathway activities. The browser is integrated with the UCSC Genome Browser; thus inheriting and integrating the Genome Browser's rich set of human biology and genetics data that enhances the interpretability of the cancer genomics data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据