4.8 Article

C-terminal domain of archaeal O-phosphoseryl-tRNA kinase displays large-scale motion to bind the 7-bp D-stem of archaeal tRNASec

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 1034-1041

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq845

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM22854]
  2. Department of Energy
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  4. Mitsubishi Foundation
  5. Japan Society of the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  6. National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
  7. Schweizerischer Nationalfonds
  8. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

O-Phosphoseryl-tRNA kinase (PSTK) is the key enzyme in recruiting selenocysteine (Sec) to the genetic code of archaea and eukaryotes. The enzyme phosphorylates Ser-tRNA(Sec) to produce O-phosphoseryl-tRNA(Sec) (Sep-tRNA(Sec)) that is then converted to Sec-tRNA(Sec) by Sep-tRNA:Sec-tRNA synthase. Earlier we reported the structure of the Methanocaldococcus jannaschii PSTK (MjPSTK) complexed with AMPPNP. This study presents the crystal structure (at 2.4-A resolution) of MjPSTK complexed with an anticodon-stem/loop truncated tRNA(Sec) (Mj*tRNA(Sec)), a good enzyme substrate. Mj*tRNA(Sec) is bound between the enzyme's C-terminal domain (CTD) and N-terminal kinase domain (NTD) that are connected by a flexible 11 amino acid linker. Upon Mj*tRNA(Sec) recognition the CTD undergoes a 62-A movement to allow proper binding of the 7-bp D-stem. This large reorganization of the PSTK quaternary structure likely provides a means by which the unique tRNA(Sec) species can be accurately recognized with high affinity by the translation machinery. However, while the NTD recognizes the tRNA acceptor helix, shortened versions of MjPSTK (representing only 60% of the original size, in which the entire CTD, linker loop and an adjacent NTD helix are missing) are still active in vivo and in vitro, albeit with reduced activity compared to the full-length enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据