4.8 Article

A comparison of RNA-Seq and high-density exon array for detecting differential gene expression between closely related species

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 578-588

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq817

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HG004634, R01GM088342, R01-HG004634]
  2. Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P51RR013986] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R01HG004634] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM088342] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RNA-Seq has emerged as a revolutionary technology for transcriptome analysis. In this article, we report a systematic comparison of RNA-Seq and high-density exon array for detecting differential gene expression between closely related species. On a panel of human/chimpanzee/rhesus cerebellum RNA samples previously examined by the high-density human exon junction array (HJAY) and real-time qPCR, we generated 48.68 million RNA-Seq reads. Our results indicate that RNA-Seq has significantly improved gene coverage and increased sensitivity for differentially expressed genes compared with the high-density HJAY array. Meanwhile, we observed a systematic increase in the RNA-Seq error rate for lowly expressed genes. Specifically, between-species DEGs detected by array/qPCR but missed by RNA-Seq were characterized by relatively low expression levels, as indicated by lower RNA-Seq read counts, lower HJAY array expression indices and higher qPCR raw cycle threshold values. Furthermore, this issue was not unique to between-species comparisons of gene expression. In the RNA-Seq analysis of MicroArray Quality Control human reference RNA samples with extensive qPCR data, we also observed an increase in both the false-negative rate and the false-positive rate for lowly expressed genes. These findings have important implications for the design and data interpretation of RNA-Seq studies on gene expression differences between and within species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据