4.8 Article

Protein Structure Initiative Material Repository: an open shared public resource of structural genomics plasmids for the biological community

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 D743-D749

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp999

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [U01 GM079617]
  2. National Cancer Institute [5P30 CA06516-06]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease [HHSN2332200400053C/N01-A1-40053]
  4. Virginia G. Piper Charitable Trust
  5. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA006516] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Protein Structure Initiative Material Repository (PSI-MR; http://psimr.asu.edu) provides centralized storage and distribution for the protein expression plasmids created by PSI researchers. These plasmids are a resource that allows the research community to dissect the biological function of proteins whose structures have been identified by the PSI. The plasmid annotation, which includes the full length sequence, vector information and associated publications, is stored in a freely available, searchable database called DNASU (http://dnasu.asu.edu). Each PSI plasmid is also linked to a variety of additional resources, which facilitates cross-referencing of a particular plasmid to protein annotations and experimental data. Plasmid samples can be requested directly through the website. We have also developed a novel strategy to avoid the most common concern encountered when distributing plasmids namely, the complexity of material transfer agreement (MTA) processing and the resulting delays this causes. The Expedited Process MTA, in which we created a network of institutions that agree to the terms of transfer in advance of a material request, eliminates these delays. Our hope is that by creating a repository of expression-ready plasmids and expediting the process for receiving these plasmids, we will help accelerate the accessibility and pace of scientific discovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据