4.8 Article

ArrayExpress update-from an archive of functional genomics experiments to the atlas of gene expression

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 -, 页码 D868-D872

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn889

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  2. European Commission [021902]
  3. EMERALD [LSHG-CT-2006-037689]
  4. DIAMONDS [LSHG- CT2004-512143]
  5. BioSapiens [LSHG-CT-2003-503265]
  6. MolPAGE [LSHG-CT-2004-512066]
  7. MUGEN [LSHGCT2005-005203]
  8. Carcinogenomics [LSHB-2006037712]
  9. Nutrigenomics [NoE-503630]
  10. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E025080/1]
  11. MAGE
  12. National Human Genome Research Institute
  13. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  14. National Institute of Health [1 P41 HG003619-01]
  15. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [P41HG003619] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  16. BBSRC [BB/E025080/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ArrayExpress http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress consists of three components: the ArrayExpress Repository-a public archive of functional genomics experiments and supporting data, the ArrayExpress Warehouse-a database of gene expression profiles and other bio-measurements and the ArrayExpress Atlas-a new summary database and meta-analytical tool of ranked gene expression across multiple experiments and different biological conditions. The Repository contains data from over 6000 experiments comprising approximately 200 000 assays, and the database doubles in size every 15 months. The majority of the data are array based, but other data types are included, most recently ultra high-throughput sequencing transcriptomics and epigenetic data. The Warehouse and Atlas allow users to query for differentially expressed genes by gene names and properties, experimental conditions and sample properties, or a combination of both. In this update, we describe the ArrayExpress developments over the last two years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据