4.8 Article

Mitochondrial DNA level, but not active replicase, is essential for Caenorhabditis elegans development

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 1817-1828

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp018

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [522-2005-7145]
  2. Angstromke Wiberg Foundation [868332643]
  3. Loo and Hans Ostermans Foundation [2006Oste0012]
  4. Marie Curie Early Stage Training Fellowship
  5. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research [A3 04:160f]
  6. U.S. National Institutes on Health/National Institute on Aging [AG027498]
  7. Ellison Medical Foundation Senior Scholar Award in Aging [AG-SS-1920]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of studies showed that the development and the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans is dependent on mitochondrial function. In this study, we addressed the role of mitochondrial DNA levels and mtDNA maintenance in development of C. elegans by analyzing deletion mutants for mitochondrial polymerase gamma (polg-1(ok1548)). Surprisingly, even though previous studies in other model organisms showed necessity of polymerase gamma for embryonic development, homozygous polg-1(ok1548) mutants had normal development and reached adulthood without any morphological defects. However, polg-1 deficient animals have a seriously compromised gonadal function as a result of severe mitochondrial depletion, leading to sterility and shortened lifespan. Our results indicate that the gonad is the primary site of mtDNA replication, whilst the mtDNA of adult somatic tissues mainly stems from the developing embryo. Furthermore, we show that the mtDNA copy number shows great plasticity as it can be almost tripled as a response to the environmental stimuli. Finally, we show that the mtDNA copy number is an essential limiting factor for the worm development and therefore, a number of mechanisms set to maintain mtDNA levels exist, ensuring a normal development of C. elegans even in the absence of the mitochondrial replicase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据