4.8 Article

EuroPhenome: a repository for high-throughput mouse phenotyping data

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 D577-D585

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp1007

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Commission [LSHG-CT-2006-037188]
  2. UK Medical Research Council
  3. NGFN (National Genome Research Network) [01GS0850]
  4. MRC [MC_U142684171, MC_UP_1502/1, MC_U127561112, MC_U142684175, MC_U142684172] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U142684172, MC_U142684171, MC_U127561112, MC_U142684175, MC_UP_1502/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The broad aim of biomedical science in the postgenomic era is to link genomic and phenotype information to allow deeper understanding of the processes leading from genomic changes to altered phenotype and disease. The EuroPhenome project (http://www.EuroPhenome.org) is a comprehensive resource for raw and annotated high-throughput phenotyping data arising from projects such as EUMODIC. EUMODIC is gathering data from the EMPReSSslim pipeline (http://www.empress.har.mrc.ac.uk/) which is performed on inbred mouse strains and knock-out lines arising from the EUCOMM project. The EuroPhenome interface allows the user to access the data via the phenotype or genotype. It also allows the user to access the data in a variety of ways, including graphical display, statistical analysis and access to the raw data via web services. The raw phenotyping data captured in EuroPhenome is annotated by an annotation pipeline which automatically identifies statistically different mutants from the appropriate baseline and assigns ontology terms for that specific test. Mutant phenotypes can be quickly identified using two EuroPhenome tools: PhenoMap, a graphical representation of statistically relevant phenotypes, and mining for a mutant using ontology terms. To assist with data definition and cross-database comparisons, phenotype data is annotated using combinations of terms from biological ontologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据