4.8 Article

Prediction of novel microRNA genes in cancer-associated genomic regionsa combined computational and experimental approach

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 10, 页码 3276-3287

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp120

关键词

-

资金

  1. Action 8.3.1 (Reinforcement Pro-gram of Human Research Manpower-'PENED 2003', [03EDelta842]) of the operational program 'competitiveness' of the Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology
  2. EU [FP6-IST-2002-507585]
  3. European Commission [PIOF-GA-2008-219622]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The majority of existing computational tools rely on sequence homology and/or structural similarity to identify novel microRNA (miRNA) genes. Recently supervised algorithms are utilized to address this problem, taking into account sequence, structure and comparative genomics information. In most of these studies miRNA gene predictions are rarely supported by experimental evidence and prediction accuracy remains uncertain. In this work we present a new computational tool (SSCprofiler) utilizing a probabilistic method based on Profile Hidden Markov Models to predict novel miRNA precursors. Via the simultaneous integration of biological features such as sequence, structure and conservation, SSCprofiler achieves a performance accuracy of 88.95% sensitivity and 84.16% specificity on a large set of human miRNA genes. The trained classifier is used to identify novel miRNA gene candidates located within cancer-associated genomic regions and rank the resulting predictions using expression information from a full genome tiling array. Finally, four of the top scoring predictions are verified experimentally using northern blot analysis. Our work combines both analytical and experimental techniques to show that SSCprofiler is a highly accurate tool which can be used to identify novel miRNA gene candidates in the human genome. SSCprofiler is freely available as a web service at http://www.imbb.forth.gr/SSCprofiler.html.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据