4.8 Article

Motif discovery in promoters of genes co-localized and co-expressed during myeloid cells differentiation

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 533-549

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn948

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Padova [CPDA065788/06, CPDR074285/07]
  2. Fondazione CARIPARO (Progetti Eccellenza 2006)
  3. MIUR
  4. Italian Association for Biology and Genetics
  5. Consorzio Interuniversitario per le Biotecnologie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genes co-expressed may be under similar promoter-based and/or position-based regulation. Although data on expression, position and function of human genes are available, their true integration still represents a challenge for computational biology, hampering the identification of regulatory mechanisms. We carried out an integrative analysis of genomic position, functional annotation and promoters of genes expressed in myeloid cells. Promoter analysis was conducted by a novel multi-step method for discovering putative regulatory elements, i.e. over-represented motifs, in a selected set of promoters, as compared with a background model. The combination of transcriptional, structural and functional data allowed the identification of sets of promoters pertaining to groups of genes co-expressed and co-localized in regions of the human genome. The application of motif discovery to 26 groups of genes co-expressed in myeloid cells differentiation and co-localized in the genome showed that there are more over-represented motifs in promoters of co-expressed and co-localized genes than in promoters of simply co-expressed genes (CEG). Motifs, which are similar to the binding sequences of known transcription factors, non-uniformly distributed along promoter sequences and/or occurring in highly co-expressed subset of genes were identified. Co-expressed and co-localized gene sets were grouped in two co-expressed genomic meta-regions, putatively representing functional domains of a high-level expression regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据