4.3 Article

CP violation from finite groups

期刊

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
卷 883, 期 -, 页码 267-305

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.03.023

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. TUM Graduate School
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY-0970173]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) [DEFG02-04ER41290]
  5. Aspen Center for Physics
  6. ERC Advanced Grant project FLAVOUR [267104]
  7. Division Of Physics
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1316792] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We discuss the origin of CP violation in settings with a discrete (flavor) symmetry G. We show that physical CP transformations always have to be class-inverting automorphisms of G. This allows us to categorize finite groups into three types: (i) Groups that do not exhibit such an automorphism and, therefore, in generic settings, explicitly violate CP. In settings based on such groups, CP violation can have pure group-theoretic origin and can be related to the complexity of some Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. (ii) Groups for which one can find a CP basis in which all the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients are real. For such groups, imposing CP invariance restricts the phases of coupling coefficients. (iii) Groups that do not admit real Clebsch-Gordan coefficients but possess a class-inverting automorphism that can be used to define a proper (generalized) CP transformation. For such groups, imposing CP invariance can lead to an additional symmetry that forbids certain couplings. We make use of the so-called twisted Frobenius-Schur indicator to distinguish between the three types of discrete groups. With Delta(27), T', and Sigma(72) we present one explicit example for each type of group, thereby illustrating the CP properties of models based on them. We also show that certain operations that have been dubbed generalized CP transformations in the recent literature do not lead to physical CP conservation. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据