4.3 Article

SU(5) tops with multiple U(1)s in F-theory

期刊

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
卷 882, 期 -, 页码 1-69

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.02.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme
  2. Heidelberg Graduate School for Fundamental Physics
  3. Collaborative Research Center TR33 The Dark Universe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study F-theory compactifications with up to two Abelian gauge group factors that are based on elliptically fibred Calabi Yau 4-folds describable as generic hypersurfaces. Special emphasis is put on elliptic fibrations based on generic Bl(2)P(2)[3]-fibrations. These exhibit a Mordell Weil group of rank two corresponding to two extra rational sections which give rise to two Abelian gauge group factors. We show that an alternative description of the same geometry as a complete intersection makes the existence of a holomorphic zero-section manifest, on the basis of which we compute the U(1) generators and a class of gauge fluxes. We analyse the fibre degenerations responsible for the appearance of localised charged matter states, whose charges, interactions and chiral index we compute geometrically. We implement an additional SU (5) gauge group by constructing the four inequivalent toric tops giving rise to SU(5) x U(1) x U(1) gauge symmetry and analyse the matter content. We demonstrate that notorious non-flat points can be avoided in well-defined Calabi Yau 4-folds. These methods are applied to the remaining possible hypersurface fibrations with one generic Abelian gauge factor. We analyse the local limit of our SU (5) x U(1) x U(1) models and show that one of our models is not embeddable into E-8 due to recombination of matter curves that cannot be described as a Higgsing of E-8. We argue that such recombination forms a general mechanism that opens up new model building possibilities in F-theory. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据