4.3 Article

Parton distributions with LHC data

期刊

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
卷 867, 期 2, 页码 244-289

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.10.003

关键词

LHC; Collider physics; Parton distributions; QCD

资金

  1. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship of the European Community's 7th Framework Programme [PIEF-GA-2010-272515]
  2. ERC [291377]
  3. STFC [ST/G000522/1, ST/J000434/1, ST/J000329/1, ST/G000581/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G000522/1, ST/J000329/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the first determination of parton distributions of the nucleon at NLO and NNLO based on a global data set which includes LHC data: NNPDF2.3. Our data set includes, besides the deep inelastic, Drell-Yan, gauge boson production and jet data already used in previous global PDF determinations, all the relevant LHC data for which experimental systematic uncertainties are currently available: ATLAS and LHCb W and Z rapidity distributions from the 2010 run, CMS W electron asymmetry data from the 2011 run, and ATLAS inclusive jet cross-sections from the 2010 run. We introduce an improved implementation of the FastKernel method which allows us to fit to this extended data set, and also to adopt a more effective minimization methodology. We present the NNPDF2.3 PDF sets, and compare them to the NNPDF2.1 sets to assess the impact of the LHC data. We find that all the LHC data are broadly consistent with each other and with all the older data sets included in the fit. We present predictions for various standard candle cross-sections. and compare them to those obtained previously using NNPDF2.1. and specifically discuss the impact of ATLAS electroweak data on the determination of the strangeness fraction of the proton. We also present collider PDF sets, constructed using only data from HERA. the Tevatron and the LHC. but find that this data set is neither precise nor complete enough for a competitive PDF determination. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据