4.3 Article

Kaluza-Klein excitations of gauge bosons at the LHC

期刊

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
卷 797, 期 1-2, 页码 1-26

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.12.024

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider the Randall-Sundrum extra-dimensional model with fields propagating in the bulk based on an extended electroweak gauge symmetry with specific fermion charges and localizations that allow to explain the LEP anomaly of the forward-backward asymmetry for b-quarks, A(FB)(b) We study the manifestations of the strongly-interacting and electroweak gauge boson Kaluza-Klein excitations V-KK at the LHC, with masses of the order of a few TeV, which dominantly decays into top and bottom quark pairs. We first analyze the two-body tree-level production processes pp -> t (t) over bar and b (b) over bar in which the Kaluza-Klein (KK) excitations of gauge bosons are exchanged. We find that the additional channels can lead to a significant excess of events with respect to the Standard Model prediction; characteristic top quark polarization and angular asymmetries are quantitatively studied where the polarization is the probe the chiral structure of couplings to excited states. We then analyze higher order production processes for the gauge boson excitations which have too weak or no couplings to light quarks and, in particular, the loop induced process gg -> V-KK -> t (t) over bar and b (b) over bar in which the anomalous gg V-KK four-dimensional vertex has to be regulated. The RS effects in this process, as well as in the four-body reactions pp -> t (t) over barb (b) over bar, t (t) over bart (t) over bar, b (b) over barb (b) over bar and in the related three-body reactions gb -> bt (t) over bar, bb (b) over bar, in which the V-KK excitations are mainly radiated off the heavy quarks, are shown to be potentially difficult to test at LHC, due to small phase space and low parton density for M-KK greater than or similar to 3 TeV. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据