4.1 Article

The difference in relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and clinicopathological factors on thyroid, esophageal, and lung cancers

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 36-43

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000019

关键词

F-18-FDG-PET; GLUT-1; Ki-67; maximum standardized uptake value; pathological T stage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to reveal the differences in clinicopathological factors affecting maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) between esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).MethodsThis study consisted of 119 patients with ESCC (n=43), PTC (n=40), or NSCLC (n=36). We investigated the correlations between SUVmax and clinicopathological factors by using Spearman's correlation coefficient and the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate which clinicopathological factors significantly affected SUVmax in each cancer type.ResultsThe SUVmax correlated with glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1) expression in NSCLC (r=0.536, P=0.007) and ESCC (r=0.597, P<0.001) but not in PTC. The SUVmax correlated with Ki-67 expression in NSCLC (r=0.381, P=0.022) and PTC (r=0.374, P=0.017) but not in ESCC. A high SUVmax was correlated with a higher pathological T stage (p-T stage) in NSCLC (r=0.536) and ESCC (r=0.597, both P<0.001) but not in PTC. An elevated SUVmax was significantly associated with pathological lymph node status (p-N) in NSCLC, but not in ESCC and PTC. In multiple regression analysis, p-T stage and GLUT-1 expression were statistically significant factors in ESCC, and p-T stage was a statistically significant factor in NSCLC. In PTC, Ki-67 showed a statistically significant association with SUVmax.ConclusionSUV(max) in NSCLC depended on the tumor invasion area; SUVmax in ESCC depended on tumor depth and GLUT-1 expression; and SUVmax in PTC might be associated with cell proliferation. The biological factors affecting SUVmax differ according to tumor type.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据