4.3 Article

Evaluation of 111In-labeled macrocyclic chelator-amino acid derivatives for cancer imaging

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 325-333

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2011.09.010

关键词

Indium-111; DO3A; Homoalanine; SPECT; Amino acid; LAT; DOTA; Amino acid transporter

资金

  1. Converging Research Center [2011K000709]
  2. NRL from MEST [ROA-2008-000-20116-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We evaluated new In-111-labeled amino acid derivatives, in which the amino acids are conjugated with1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA), 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,7-diacetic acid (DO2A) or 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododectine-1,4,7-triacetic acid (DO3A). Methods: DOTA-aminoalanine (DOTA-A), DOTA-aminohomoalanine (DOTA-H), DOTA-lysine (DOTA-L), DO2A-alanine (DO2A-A), DO3A-alanine (DO3A-A) and DO3A-homoalanine (DO3A-H) were labeled with I In. In vitro cell uptake assays were performed usingHep3B (a human hepatoma cell line), CT26 (a mouse colon cancer cell line) and U87MG (a human glioma cell line). In vitro cell uptake inhibition assays were performed using U87MG and In-111-DO3A-H. U87MG bearing xenografted mice were subject to biodistribution, SPECT imaging, autoradiography, and immunohistochemistry studies. Results: Of the amino acid derivatives and cell lines examined, U87MG and In-111-DO3A-14 showed highest uptake in vitro. This uptake was blocked by 2-aminobicyclo-[2,2,1] heptane-2-carboxylic acid (BCH) and by tryptophan. In-111-DO3A-HSPECT imaging of U87MG bearing xenografted mice visualized tumors (mean tumor-to-muscle ratio 3.16 +/- 0.74). Autoradiography and immunohistochemistry revealed that In-111-DO3A-H uptake matched L-type amino acid transporter 1 expression. Conclusion: Tumor uptake was successfully imaged using In-111-DO3A-H in U87MG bearing xenografted mice. In-111-DO3A-H appears to be useful for imaging tumors expressing L-type amino acid transporter. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据