4.3 Article

Development of a PET radioligand for the central 5-HT1B receptor: radiosynthesis and characterization in cynomolgus monkeys of eight radiolabeled compounds

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 261-272

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2010.08.006

关键词

Radioligand development; Positron emission tomography (PET); Serotonin; 5-HT1B

资金

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Swedish Science Council [VR 09114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The serotonin 1B (5-HT1B) receptor has been implicated in several psychiatric disorders and is a potential pharmacological target in the treatment of depression. The aim of this study was to develop a radioligand for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the 5-HT1B receptor in the primate brain in vivo. Methods: Eight carboxamide radioligands (1-8) from three different core structures were radiolabeled with carbon-11 employing N-methylation with [C-11]methyl triflate on the piperazine structural moiety. In vivo PET evaluation of each radioligand was performed in cynomolgus monkeys and included analysis of radioactive metabolites measured in plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography. Results: In a total of 12 radiosynthesis of the eight radioligands, the mean decay corrected yield was 11%, and the mean specific radioactivity was 299 CBq/mu mol (8075 Ci/mmol) at time of administration. Of the eight tested candidates, [C-11]6 demonstrated the most promising in vivo characteristics, showing high binding in 5-HT1B receptor-rich regions and low binding in the cerebellum. When inspecting data from all eight compounds, lipophilicity appeared as a physicochemical property that could be related to favorable in vivo imaging characteristics. Conclusion: Candidate [C-11]6, i.e., [C-11]AZ10419369, exhibited high binding potentials in regions known to contain 5-HT1B receptors and was nominated for further preclinical characterization and PET examination in human subjects. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据