4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Oxygen-excess-related point defects in glassy/amorphous SiO2 and related materials

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2012.02.038

关键词

Silicon dioxide; Silica glass; Alpha quartz; Point defects; Optical absorption; EPR; Luminescence; Dangling bonds; NBOHC; Interstitial oxygen; Neutron irradiation; Gamma irradiation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An insight is given into recent experimental advances in the spectroscopic studies of oxygen-excess intrinsic defects, in glassy SiO2 and alpha-quartz. By controlling excess oxygen in a-SiO2, and the conditions of F-2-laser irradiation, SiO2 glass samples can be obtained with optical absorption almost exclusively dominated by single defect, oxygen dangling bonds (non-bridging oxygen hole centers or NBOHCs), without the presence of complementary Si dangling bonds (generic E'-centers). This allows for a more accurate determination of the spectral shape of NBOHC optical absorption in UV and vacuum UV spectral regions. The temperature dependence of NBOHC electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signal intensity is stronger than predicted by Curie's law (1/T) even at temperatures at and below 77 K. Dangling bonds are characteristic of an amorphous state and do not exist in a regular crystal lattice. However, site-selective luminescence shows that highly ordered NBOHCs exist in particle-irradiated alpha-quartz, evidently either on the border between the damage tracks and the crystalline phase or as a part of Si vacancies. They are different from the common glass-like NBOHCs in a-SiO2 by giving distinct sharp zero-phonon lines with characteristic energies in luminescence spectra instead of a continuous distribution of lines. Two distinct types of luminescent NBOHCs, associated with the long and short Si-O bonds in alpha-quartz are suggested. EPR data corroborate the presence of oriented NBOHCs in neutron-irradiated alpha-quartz and confirm distinct NBOHCs at the sites of long and short Si-O bonds in alpha-quartz. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据