4.5 Article

Pedestal stability comparison and ITER pedestal prediction

期刊

NUCLEAR FUSION
卷 49, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

INT ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/49/8/085035

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG03-95ER54309, DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-FG02-92ER54141, DE-FC02-99ER54512]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-92ER54141] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G003955/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/G003955/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pressure at the top of the edge transport barrier (or 'pedestal height') strongly impacts fusion performance, while large edge localized modes (ELMs), driven by the free energy in the pedestal region, can constrain material lifetimes. Accurately predicting the pedestal height and ELM behavior in ITER is an essential element of prediction and optimization of fusion performance. Investigation of intermediate wavelength MHD modes (or 'peeling ballooning' modes) has led to an improved understanding of important constraints on the pedestal height and the mechanism for ELMs. The combination of high-resolution pedestal diagnostics, including substantial recent improvements, and a suite of highly efficient stability codes, has made edge stability analysis routine on several major tokamaks, contributing both to understanding, and to experimental planning and performance optimization. Here we present extensive comparisons of observations to predicted edge stability boundaries on several tokamaks, both for the standard (Type I) ELM regime, and for small ELM and ELM-free regimes. We further discuss a new predictive model for the pedestal height and width (EPED1), developed by self-consistently combining a simple width model with peeling-ballooning stability calculations. This model is tested against experimental measurements, and used in initial predictions of the pedestal height for ITER.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据