4.5 Article

Long-pulse hybrid scenario development in JT-60U

期刊

NUCLEAR FUSION
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/49/6/065026

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18686076]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18686076] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance and sustained duration of long-pulse discharges for the 'ITER hybrid scenario' have been improved in JT-60U. The modification of power supply systems for three perpendicular neutral beam (NB) injections provides a long period of central NB heating up to 30 s, which is important for keeping the internal transport barrier (ITB). The peaked density profile in the core plasma can be maintained even when the density at the pedestal increased in the latter phase of the discharge due to the increase in the divertor recycling. Then, the peaked pressure profile attributed to the ITB can be kept constant through the discharge with the peaked power deposition profile. In these long-pulse discharges, MHD activity with toroidal mode number n = 1 is observed even when neoclassical tearing modes (NTMs) are suppressed. When the amplitude of the mode in the peripheral region becomes large, the pedestal pressure is degraded. The mode amplitude is sensitive to the toroidal magnetic field (or edge safety factor) and heating power. After the adjustment of the toroidal magnetic field so as to reduce the mode amplitude, a high normalized beta (beta(N)) of 2.6 and a high thermal confinement enhancement factor (H-H98(y,H- 2) > 1) are sustained for 25 s (similar to 14 tau(R), where tau(R) is the current diffusion time) under the ITER relevant small toroidal rotation condition. The peaked pressure profile in low safety factor plasma (safety factor at 95% flux surface q(95) similar to 3.2) is stable against NTMs up to beta(N) similar to 3. A high beta H-N(H98(y, 2)) of 2.6 gives a high G-factor (beta H-N(H98(y, 2))/q(95)(2)) of 0.25 and a peaked pressure profile gives a large bootstrap current fraction (f(BS) > 0.43).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据