4.5 Article

Experimental study of friction and heat transfer characteristics in narrow rectangular channel

期刊

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 646-655

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.06.029

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HEUCFZ1008]
  2. Heilongjiang Province Foundation for Returnees [LC2011C18]
  3. Heilongjiang Province Post-doctor Scientific Research Fund [LBH-Q10131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents an experimental investigation of the friction and heat transfer characteristics in a narrow rectangular channel. Nine groups of experiments are conducted and the fluid temperature difference between the inlet and outlet of the test section is kept constant in each experimental run. The results show that the friction factors in isothermal condition can be well correlated by the Leon correlation for the developed laminar and turbulent flow, and the Bhatti and Shah correlation for the laminar to turbulent transition region. In addition, the friction factors prediction correlations in non-isothermal condition are proposed based on the viscosity ratio method. The heat transfer characteristic is not affected by the change of temperature difference in laminar flow. However, as in the fully developed turbulent flow, the Prandtl number significantly influences the heat transfer characteristic. The heat transfer temperature difference between the wall and fluid increases with the increase of Reynolds number in the laminar flow, and decreases sharply as the flow enters the transition region. However, it does not present a significant variation in the fully developed turbulent flow regime. Based on the analysis of heat transfer temperature difference, a new correlation for calculating the Nusselt number in the turbulent flow regime of a rectangular channel is introduced and the agreement between experimental data and predicted values is satisfactory. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据