4.0 Article

Growth and Feed Efficiency of Channel X Blue Catfish Hybrids Stocked at Various Densities and Fed Once or Twice Daily in Ponds

期刊

NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AQUACULTURE
卷 72, 期 2, 页码 150-157

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1577/A09-044.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. MAFES [MIS-371380]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of stocking density and feeding frequency on the growth, net yield, and feed conversion of hybrid catfish (female channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus 3 male blue catfish I. furcatus). In experiment 1, hybrid catfish fingerlings with a mean initial weight of 65 g were stocked into ten 0.4-ha earthen ponds at a density of 12,355 fish/ha. In experiment 2, hybrid catfish fingerlings with the same mean initial weight as in experiment 1 were stocked into twenty 0.4-ha earthen ponds at densities of 18,532 and 24,710 fish/ha, respectively. Fish were fed once or twice daily to apparent satiation. In experiment 1, all fish were harvested in early September. In experiment 2, market-size fish (target size, >0.794 kg/fish) were selectively harvested in late September by means of an in-pond mechanical fish grader with the bar spacing set to 5.4 cm. All remaining fish were harvested in mid-June the next year. In both experiments, fish fed twice daily were given more feed, but there were no significant differences in weight gain per fish and net yield between fish fed once daily and those fed twice daily. Fish fed twice daily had a significantly higher feed conversion ratio. In experiment 2, a stocking density of 18,532 fish/ha resulted in higher weight gain and lower net yield than a stocking density of 24,710 fish/ha. Based on the results from this study, it appears to be efficient to stock hybrids at a density of 12,355 fish/ha, feed them once daily over a growing season, and clean'' harvest them at the end of the season. However, a multiple-batch system may also be used to grow hybrids at densities of 18,532-24,710 fish/ha by means of a catfish grading system to remove market-size fish.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据