4.7 Article

Properties of CNTs coated by PEDOT:PSS films via spin-coating and electrophoretic deposition methods for flexible transparent electrodes

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 271, 期 -, 页码 22-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.01.045

关键词

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs); PEDOT:PSS (poly (3,4-ethylene-dioxythiophene):poly (styrenesulfonate)); Hybrid flexible electrodes; Bending test; Electrophoretic deposition (EPD); Spin-coating

资金

  1. BK21PLUS program through National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Education
  2. Basic Science Research Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [2012008365]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid-type transparent electrodes, which possess the characteristics desirable for flexible touch screen panels, were fabricated by coating PEDOT:PSS [poly (3, 4-ethylene-dioxythio-phene):poly (styrenesulfonate)] films on carbon nanotubes (CNTs) via either spin-coating or electrophoretic deposition (EPD). For all the samples including the CNTs and the hybrid electrodes (i.e., PEDOT:PSS-coated CNTs), surface morphologies and cross-sections, sheet resistances, and visible transmittances were characterized as functions of their preparation conditions. Also, to identify the flexible capabilities of the hybrid electrodes, the changes in their sheet resistances due to repetitive bending (up to 30,000 times) were measured and compared with the results measured for the CNTs. In the hybrid-type electrodes, the PEDOT:PSS particles filled up the voids between the tubes in the CNTs, thereby forming a conduction bridge for electron transfer and eventually decreasing the sheet resistance. Furthermore, the PEDOT:PSS layers induced physical gripping of the CNTs to enable them to adhere better to the underlying PET substrates, indicating that the hybrid electrodes were more desirable in flexibility than were the CNTs. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据