4.0 Article

Mood disorders and quality of life. A community study

期刊

NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 58-62

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/08039480903287565

关键词

Community study; Mood disorders; Quality of life; Socio-demographic variables

资金

  1. Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation, Norway
  2. Norwegian Council for Research
  3. Department of Mental Health, Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between different quality of life sub-indexes and various mood disorders. To our knowledge, this is the first study of the relationship between quality of life and clinical conditions within the whole realm of mood disorders, past and present. Methods: More than 2000 persons between 18 and 65 years old from the community were studied. DSM-III-R diagnoses were assessed by the structured interview Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Quality of life included seven aspects: Subjective well-being, Self-realization; Contact with friends, Support if ill, Absence of negative life events, Contact with family of origin; Neighbourhood quality, and a composite score; Global quality of life. Results: Reduced quality of life was observed among persons with all kinds of mood disorders the previous year. That was also the case for previous mood disorders, especially bipolar and dysthymic disorder. Those with present psychotic major depression and past bipolar disorder had the most reduced quality of life. Among the sub-indexes, subjective well-being was most affected by mood disorders, followed by negative life events and lack of social support. The relationships did not disappear when controlled for socio-demographic factors and somatic health. Limitations: We do not know whether our results can be fully generalized to severe patient populations. Conclusion: Mood disorders, current as well as in remission, are related to a number of aspects of reduced quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据