4.7 Article

Using three-dimensional fractal dimension to analyze the complexity of fetal cortical surface from magnetic resonance images

期刊

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 745-752

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-009-9515-y

关键词

Fetal cortical surface; Fractal dimension; Box-counting method

资金

  1. National Science Council [932213E010007]
  2. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [94-364]
  3. National Health Research Institutes [NHRI-EX94-CD9401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the complexity of the developing fetal cortical surface based on the notion of fractal dimension (FD). Forty-four fetal MR images were selected at 22-36 weeks of gestational age (GA) and distributed between two groups: 32 normal fetal brains (excluding twins) and 12 abnormal fetal brains, including twins, mild ventricular dilatation, Cornelia de Lange syndrome (small brain), and cortical dysplasia (developmental delay). We adopted the commonly used box-counting (BC) method to estimate the FD of the developing fetal cortical surface. Results from normal fetal brains show that the increase of cortical complexity is highly correlated with fetal developing weeks of GA. In addition, after 28 weeks of GA, the value of FD increases more rapidly because of the faster development of convolved folds. In comparison with results from the normal fetal group, the abnormal fetal brains were examined and the results show that: (1) mild ventricular dilatation has no significant developing difference compared with normal fetal brains; (2) twins had lower FD than that of normal fetal brains, which may be a delay of 2-3 weeks; (3) the case of cortical dysplasia also had low FD, indicating that developing delay may mean less cortical complexity. The results of the normal group are in good agreement with fetal brain development and demonstrate the effectiveness of FD as a promising means for the quantification of complexity of the fetal cortical surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据