4.1 Article

Study of the effects of processing parameters on the sound absorption of open-cell microcellular polymeric foams

期刊

NOISE CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 18-26

出版社

INST NOISE CONTROL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.3397/1.3264660

关键词

-

资金

  1. Government of Canada through the Networks of Centres of Excellence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various researchers have investigated microcellular polymeric foams extensively over the last twenty years or so; however, little work has been conducted on the acoustic performance of these foams when their microstructural components are modified by controlling the manufacturing process parameters. The studies discussed in this paper represent an initial stage in the development of open cell foams that exhibit optimized acoustic performance as a result of controlling processing parameters. This study was focused to understand and control certain parameters that dictate the material's microstructure, such as cell size, and link them to the main macroscopic parameters, such as the airflow resistivity and porosity, which govern the overall sound absorption of an open cell material. In this paper, we investigate a new processing technology to manufacture open-cell sound absorbing PMMA (Poly Methyl Methacrylate) materials using a gas foaming/particulate leaching method. An acoustic parametric study is conducted by altering the main processing parameters such as foaming temperature, particle size, and percentage of foaming agent, which affect the cell morphologies and thus control the macroscopic properties. As such, we explore the effects of the adjusted processing parameters on the acoustic performance of the manufactured PMMA samples. The correlations between the resulting cell morphologies and the sound absorption properties indicate that understanding and controlling the porous material's inner structure is crucial for developing any type of open-cell porous material with optimal acoustical efficiency. (C) 2010 Institute of Noise Control Engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据