4.4 Article

Oxygen-enhanced 3D radial ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging in the healthy human lung

期刊

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 1535-1541

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3158

关键词

oxygen enhanced; ventilation; lung; UTE; MRI; ultrashort echo time

资金

  1. University of Wisconsin Department of Radiology RD Committee
  2. Hartwell Foundation
  3. UW School of Medicine and Public Health from the Wisconsin Partnership Program
  4. UW Graduate School
  5. Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program
  6. NIH/NHLBI [U10 HL109168, P01 HL070831]
  7. [UL1TR000427]
  8. [KL2TR000428]
  9. [1UL1RR025011]
  10. [9U54TR000021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this work was to use 3D radial ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI to perform whole-lung oxygen-enhanced (OE) imaging in humans. Eight healthy human subjects underwent two 3D radial UTE MRI acquisitions (TE=0.08ms): one while breathing 21% O-2 and the other while breathing 100% O-2. Scans were each performed over 5min of free breathing, using prospective respiratory gating. For comparison purposes, conventional echo time (TE=2.1ms) images were acquired simultaneously during each acquisition using a radial outward-inward k-space trajectory. 3D percent OE maps were generated from these images. 3D OE maps showing lung signal enhancement were generated successfully in seven subjects (technical failure in one subject). Mean percent signal enhancement was 6.6%1.8%, near the value predicted by theory of 6.3%. No significant enhancement was seen using the conventional echo time data, confirming the importance of UTE for this acquisition strategy. 3D radial UTE MRI shows promise as a method for OE MRI that enables whole-lung coverage and isotropic spatial resolution, in comparison to existing 2D OE methods, which rely on a less time-efficient inversion recovery pulse sequence. These qualities may help OE MRI become a viable low-cost method for 3D imaging of lung function in human subjects. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据