4.4 Article

Correlative assessment of tumor microcirculation using contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI: is there a link between them?

期刊

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
卷 27, 期 10, 页码 1184-1191

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3172

关键词

gliomas; intravoxel incoherent motion analysis; perfusion MR; blood flow; perfusion fraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to correlate intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging with classical perfusion-weighted MRI metrics in human gliomas. Parametric images for slow diffusion coefficient (D), fast diffusion coefficient (D*), and fractional perfusion-related volume (f) in patients with high-grade gliomas were generated. Maps of F-p (plasma flow), v(p) (vascular plasma volume), PS (permeability surface-area product), v(e) (extravascular, extracellular volume), E (extraction ratio), k(e) (influx ratio into the interstitium), and t(c) (vascular transit time) from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced (DSC) MRI were also generated. A region-of-interest analysis on the contralateral healthy white matter and on the tumor areas was performed and the extracted parameter values were tested for any significant differences among tumor grades or any correlations. Only f could be significantly correlated to DSC-derived v(p) and t(c) in healthy brain tissue. Concerning the tumor regions, F-p was significantly positively correlated with D* and inversely correlated with f in DSC measurements. The D*, f, and fxD* values in the WHO grade III gliomas were non-significantly different from those in the grade IV gliomas. There was a trend to significant negative correlations between f and PS as well as between fxD* and k(e) in DCE experiments. Presumably due to different theoretical background, tracer properties and modeling of the tumor vasculature in the IVIM theory, there is no clearly evident link between D*, f and DSC- and DCE-derived metrics. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据