4.4 Article

Alginate-coated magnetic nanoparticles for noninvasive MRI of extracellular calcium

期刊

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 774-783

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3117

关键词

alginates; contrast agents; MRI; molecular MRI; calcium sensing; magnetic nanoparticles

资金

  1. Ministry of Health of the state of Israel [6225]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticles (NPs) have great potential to increase the diagnostic capacity of many imaging modalities. MRI is currently regarded as the method of choice for the imaging of deep tissues, and metal ions, such as calcium ions (Ca2+), are essential ingredients for life. Despite the tremendous importance of Ca2+ for the well-being of living systems, the noninvasive determination of the changes in Ca2+ levels in general, and extracellular Ca2+ levels in particular, in deep tissues remains a challenge. Here, we describe the preparation and contrast mechanism of a flexible easy to prepare and selective superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) NPs for the noninvasive determination of changes in extracellular Ca2+ levels using conventional MRI. We show that SPIO NPs coated with monodisperse and purified alginate, having a specific molecular weight, provide a tool to selectively determine Ca2+ concentrations in the range of 250 mu M to 2.5mM, even in the presence of competitive ions. The alginate-coated magnetic NPs (MNPs) aggregate in the presence of Ca2+, which, in turn, affects the T-2 relaxation of the water protons in their vicinity. The new alginatecoated SPIO NP formulations, which have no effect on cell viability for 24 h, allow the detection of Ca2+ levels secreted from ischemic cell cultures and the qualitative examination of the change in extracellular Ca2+ levels in vivo. These results demonstrate that alginate-coated MNPs can be used, at least qualitatively, as a platform for the noninvasive MRI determination of extracellular Ca2+ levels in myriad in vitro and in vivo biomedical applications. Copyright (C) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据