4.6 Article

Presurgical symptom profiles predict quality of life 2 years after surgery in women with breast cancer

期刊

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 243-251

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-015-2784-8

关键词

Symptom profiles; Symptom burden; Breast cancer; Quality of life; Classification

资金

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 94-2314-B-182-025, NSC 95-2314-B-182-005, NSC 96-2628-B-182-032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Higher symptom burden in oncology patients is associated with poorer quality of life (QOL). However, the long-term predictive relationship between pre-treatment symptom profiles and QOL is unknown. The aim of this study was to identify subgroups of breast cancer patients based on their presurgical symptom profiles and to examine the predictive effect of group membership on QOL 2 years after surgery. Data were analyzed from a longitudinal study of women's (N = 198) symptoms after breast cancer surgery. Patient subgroups were identified by latent class analysis based on presurgical severity of five symptoms (i.e., attentional and physical fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety). Among these 198 women, quality of life 2 years after surgery was available for 97. Group differences in QOL were examined by general linear models. We identified four distinct patient groups. Group A (All Low) had low levels of all symptoms. Group B (Low Fatigue and Moderate Mood) was characterized by low attentional and physical fatigue but moderate sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety. Group C (All Moderate) was characterized by moderate levels of all five symptoms. Group D was characterized by moderate attentional and physical fatigue and severe sleep disturbance, depression, and anxiety (Moderate Fatigue and High Mood). Group D had significantly lower overall QOL scores 2 years after surgery than Group A (p = 0.002). Breast cancer patients' presurgical symptom profile had a long-term predictive effect on QOL. Routine assessment of patients' pre-treatment symptom is suggested to identify high risk group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据