4.4 Article

Diffusion abnormalities in temporal lobes of children with temporal lobe epilepsy: a preliminary diffusional kurtosis imaging study and comparison with diffusion tensor imaging

期刊

NMR IN BIOMEDICINE
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 1369-1377

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.2809

关键词

temporal lobe epilepsy; children; diffusional kurtosis imaging; diffusion tensor imaging; preliminary study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this preliminary study, we aimed to investigate the abnormalities of water diffusion in children with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). Eight children with unilateral TLE (according to electroencephalography, EEG) and eight age- and sex-matched controls were recruited. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)/diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) acquisitions were performed. Radial diffusivity (??), axial diffusivity (??), mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps were calculated for both DTI and DKI, and radial kurtosis (K?), axial kurtosis (K?) and mean kurtosis (MK) maps were calculated for DKI only. MannWhitney test showed that, for white matter in the temporal lobe, DKI-derived ??, MD and K? were significantly different in bilateral temporal lobes and EEG-abnormal and EEG-normal sides of the temporal lobe between patients and controls, whereas DTI showed no abnormalities. For gray matter, DKI detected significantly higher MD and MK in the same three comparisons, whereas DTI detected abnormalities only in the comparison between bilateral temporal lobes and between EEG-normal sides in cases and leftright matched sides in controls. No significant difference was observed between EEG-abnormal and EEG-normal sides in cases. These preliminary results indicate that DKI is more sensitive than DTI for the detection of diffusion abnormalities in the temporal lobes of children with TLE, even when EEG signals are normal. These findings pave the way for the application of DKI for in-depth studies on TLE in children. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据