4.5 Article

BaHfO3 artificial pinning centres in TFA-MOD-derived YBCO and GdBCO thin films

期刊

SUPERCONDUCTOR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/28/11/114002

关键词

REBCO; BHO; nanocomposite; chemical solution deposition; pinning

资金

  1. EUROTAPES
  2. European Union [NMP-LA-2012-280 432]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [24 691-COUNTATOMS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical solution deposition (CSD) is a promising way to realize REBa2Cu3O7-x (REBCO; RE = rare earth (here Y, Gd))-coated conductors with high performance in applied magnetic fields. However, the preparation process contains numerous parameters which need to be tuned to achieve high-quality films. Therefore, we investigated the growth of REBCO thin films containing nanometre-scale BaHfO3 (BHO) particles as pinning centres for magnetic flux lines, with emphasis on the influence of crystallization temperature and substrate on the microstructure and superconductivity. Conductivity, microscopy and x-ray investigations show an enhanced performance of BHO nano-composites in comparison to pristine REBCO. Further, those measurements reveal the superiority of GdBCO to YBCO-e.g. by inductive critical current densities, J(c), at self-field and 77 K. YBCO is outperformed by more than 1 MA cm(-2) with J(c) values of up to 5.0 MA cm (2) for 265 nm thick layers of GdBCO(BHO) on lanthanum aluminate. Transport in-field J(c) measurements demonstrate high pinning force maxima of around 4 GN m(-3) for YBCO(BHO) and GdBCO(BHO). However, the irreversibility fields are appreciably higher for GdBCO. The critical temperature was not significantly reduced upon BHO addition to both YBCO and GdBCO, indicating a low tendency for Hf diffusion into the REBCO matrix. Angular-dependent J(c) measurements show a reduction of the anisotropy in the same order of magnitude for both REBCO compounds. Theoretical models suggest that more than one sort of pinning centre is active in all CSD films.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据