4.2 Review

Defining animal welfare - does consistency matter?

期刊

NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 71-73

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2009.36880

关键词

Animal welfare; definitions; science; ethics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Animal welfare has many varied understandings reflecting social concerns for, and the scientific assessments of, the way animals are treated. They range from the absence of suffering, to where the animal is in a state of complete mental and physical health and in harmony with its environment, to an economic or sociopolitical understanding reflecting human preferences. Animal welfare thus has both empirical (scientific) and moral components. It is suggested that the term should be considered as a judgement to be undertaken by combining varied understandings. Furthermore, it may be more important to acknowledge underlying values and assumptions, both moral and scientific, than to risk excluding valid viewpoints through pursuing a prescriptive definition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据