4.2 Article

The growth and productivity of 'Festival' strawberry plants growing in a subtropical environment

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2013.850439

关键词

growth analysis; dry matter production and distribution; Fragaria xananassa; productivity; southeastern Queensland; climate

资金

  1. Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL)
  2. Strawberries Australia
  3. Queensland Strawberry Growers' Association
  4. Florida Strawberry Growers' Association
  5. Sweets Strawberry Runners
  6. Red Jewel Nursery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments were conducted over 5 years to understand the seasonal phenology of bare-rooted 'Festival' strawberry plants (Fragaria xananassa) growing at Nambour in southeastern Queensland, Australia. Yields ranged from 661 to 966 g/plant, and average seasonal fruit fresh weight ranged from 15 to 18 g. The growth of the leaves, crowns, roots, flowers and fruit over time followed a linear or sigmoid pattern. Maximum values of leaf, crown and root dry weight towards the end of the growing season about 190 days after planting were 30, 15 and 7 g/plant, respectively. The rates of leaf and crown growth were lower than those achieved in California under a Mediterranean climate. There were strong relationships between the allocation of dry matter to the leaves, crowns and roots and plant dry weight. Allocation to the leaves, and especially to the crowns and roots, declined as the plants grew. The number of fruit/plant increased initially over time with a decline later in the season. Average fruit fresh weight was generally higher early in the season and then declined as fruit production increased. There were strong relationships between the growth of the whole plant and the growth of the flowers and immature fruit, and leaf expansion, across the growing season and across the 5 different years. These results indicate that seasonal growth and potential productivity were strongly linked to the expansion of the leaves in this environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据