4.3 Article

Impact of renal failure on all-cause mortality and other outcomes in patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention

期刊

ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 108, 期 11, 页码 554-562

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.001

关键词

PCI; Renal failure; STEMI

资金

  1. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  2. Daiichi-Sankyo
  3. Eli Lilly
  4. BRAHMS
  5. anofi-aventis
  6. Federation francaise de cardiologie
  7. Societe francaise de cardiologie
  8. Inserm
  9. AstraZeneca
  10. Cordis
  11. Iroko Cardio International
  12. STENTYS
  13. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  14. sanofi-aventis
  15. Guerbet Medical
  16. Medtronic
  17. Boston Scientific
  18. Stago
  19. Centocor
  20. Fondation de France
  21. Boston
  22. Terumo
  23. Biotronik
  24. Bayer
  25. CFR
  26. Europa
  27. GlaxoSmithKline
  28. GLG
  29. Lead-Up
  30. LLC
  31. Luminex
  32. McKinsey
  33. Remedica
  34. Servier
  35. TIMI Group
  36. WebMD
  37. Wolters
  38. Menarini
  39. Accumetrics
  40. Abbott Vascular
  41. Nanospheres

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Patients with renal failure (RF) have been systematically excluded from clinical trials; consequently their outcomes have not been well studied in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aims. To compare cardiovascular outcomes after contemporary PCI in patients with versus without RF, according to clinical presentation (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], acute coronary syndrome [ACS] or stable coronary artery disease [sCAD]). Methods. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with stent were prospectively included from 2007 to 2012. RF was defined as creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and target lesion revascularization [TLR]), TLR and Academic Research Consortium definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year. Results. Among 5337 patients, 23% had PCI for STEMI, 34% for ACS and 43% for sCAD, while 27% had RE. RE patients had a higher unadjusted death rate than those with preserved renal function (nRF) in all PCI indication groups (STEMI, 41% vs. 7.5%; ACS, 19% vs. 6%; sCAD, 10% vs. 3%; P < 0.0001 for all). The rate of MACCE was also higher in RF patients whatever the PCI indication (STEMI, 45% vs. 15%; ACS, 23% vs. 14%; sCAD, 14% vs. 9%; P < 0.05 for all). Rates of TLR (5.5-7.4%) and ST (< 2.5%) were similar (P > 0.05 for both). sCAD-RF and STEMI-nRF patients had similar rates of mortality (P=0.209) and MACCE (P=0.658). RE was independently associated with mortality, with a doubled relative risk in STEMI versus ACS and sCAD groups (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 3.627-7.821 vs. 2.1, 1.465-3.140 and 2.3, 1.507-3.469, respectively; P < 0.0001). Conclusion. RE is a stronger independent predictor of death after PCI in STEMI than in ACS or sCAD patients. sCAD-RF and STEMI-nRF patients had similar prognoses. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据