4.6 Review

Hydrogen peroxide metabolism and functions in plants

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 221, 期 3, 页码 1197-1214

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15488

关键词

ascorbate peroxidase (APX); catalase; hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); oxidative stress; peroxidase; peroxiredoxin; reactive oxygen species (ROS); superoxide (O-2(center dot-))

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I020004/1, BB/N001311/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/I020004/1, BB/N001311/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is produced, via superoxide and superoxide dismutase, by electron transport in chloroplasts and mitochondria, plasma membrane NADPH oxidases, peroxisomal oxidases, type III peroxidases and other apoplastic oxidases. Intracellular transport is facilitated by aquaporins and H2O2 is removed by catalase, peroxiredoxin, glutathione peroxidase-like enzymes and ascorbate peroxidase, all of which have cell compartment-specific isoforms. Apoplastic H2O2 influences cell expansion, development and defence by its involvement in type III peroxidase-mediated polymer cross-linking, lignification and, possibly, cell expansion via H2O2-derived hydroxyl radicals. Excess H2O2 triggers chloroplast and peroxisome autophagy and programmed cell death. The role of H2O2 in signalling, for example during acclimation to stress and pathogen defence, has received much attention, but the signal transduction mechanisms are poorly defined. H2O2 oxidizes specific cysteine residues of target proteins to the sulfenic acid form and, similar to other organisms, this modification could initiate thiol-based redox relays and modify target enzymes, receptor kinases and transcription factors. Quantification of the sources and sinks of H2O2 is being improved by the spatial and temporal resolution of genetically encoded H2O2 sensors, such as HyPer and roGFP2-Orp1. These H2O2 sensors, combined with the detection of specific proteins modified by H2O2, will allow a deeper understanding of its signalling roles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据