4.6 Article

Linking variation in intrinsic water-use efficiency to isohydricity: a comparison at multiple spatiotemporal scales

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 221, 期 1, 页码 195-208

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15384

关键词

anisohydric; climate change; dendrochronology; drought; isohydric; stable carbon isotope composition (delta C-13); vapor pressure deficit; water-use efficiency (WUE)

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, through the Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program
  2. AmeriFlux Management Project
  3. National Science Foundation, Division of Environmental Biology [DEB 1552747]
  4. USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative [2017-67013-26191]
  5. Indiana University Vice Provost of Research Faculty Research Program
  6. Indiana University Research and Teaching Preserve Grant Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Species-specific responses of plant intrinsic water-use efficiency (iWUE) to multiple environmental drivers associated with climate change, including soil moisture (theta), vapor pressure deficit (D), and atmospheric CO2 concentration (c(a)), are poorly understood. We assessed how the iWUE and growth of several species of deciduous trees that span a gradient of isohydric to anisohydric water-use strategies respond to key environmental drivers (theta, D and c(a)). iWUE was calculated for individual tree species using leaf-level gas exchange and tree-ring delta C-13 in wood measurements, and for the whole forest using the eddy covariance method. The iWUE of the isohydric species was generally more sensitive to environmental change than the anisohydric species was, and increased significantly with rising D during the periods of water stress. At longer timescales, the influence of c(a) was pronounced for isohydric tulip poplar but not for others. Trees' physiological responses to changing environmental drivers can be interpreted differently depending on the observational scale. Care should be also taken in interpreting observed or modeled trends in iWUE that do not explicitly account for the influence of D.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据