4.6 Article

Three causes of variation in the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) in evergreen conifers

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 206, 期 1, 页码 187-195

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/nph.13159

关键词

acclimation; carotenoid:Chl ratios; cold stress; conifers; leaf pigments; photochemical reflectance index (PRI); photosynthetic down-regulation; xanthophyll cycle

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Alberta Innovates (iCORE/AITF)
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photochemical reflectance index (PRI) reflects diurnal xanthophyll cycle activity and is also influenced by seasonally changing carotenoid:Chl pigment ratios. Both changing pigment pools and xanthophyll cycle activity contribute to photoprotection in evergreen conifers exposed to boreal winters, but they operate over different timescales, and their relative contribution to the PRI signal has often been unclear. To clarify these responses and their contribution to the PRI signal, leaf PRI, pigment composition, temperature and irradiance were monitored over 2yr for two evergreen conifers (Pinus contorta and Pinusponderosa) in a boreal climate. PRI was affected by three distinct processes operating over different timescales and exhibiting contrasting spectral responses. Over the 2yr study period, the greatest change in PRI resulted from seasonally changing carotenoid:Chl pigment ratios, followed by a previously unreported shifting leaf albedo during periods of deep cold. Remarkably, the smallest change was attributable to the xanthophyll cycle. To properly distinguish these three effects, interpretation of PRI must consider temporal context, physiological responses to evolving environmental conditions, and spectral response. Consideration of the separate mechanisms affecting PRI over different timescales could greatly improve efforts to monitor changing photosynthetic activity using optical remote sensing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据