4.6 Article

Leading dimensions in absorptive root trait variation across 96 subtropical forest species

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 203, 期 3, 页码 863-872

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12842

关键词

branch order; root anatomy; root architecture; root foraging strategies; trait economics

资金

  1. One-Hundred Talent Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZZD-EW-TZ-11]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB950602]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31325006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Absorptive root traits show remarkable cross-species variation, but major root trait dimensions across species have not been defined. We sampled first-order roots and measured 14 root traits for 96 angiosperm woody species from subtropical China, including root diameter, specific root length, stele diameter, cortex thickness, root vessel size and density, mycorrhizal colonization rate, root branching intensity, tissue density, and concentrations of carbon and nitrogen ([N]). Root traits differed in the degree of variation and phylogenetic conservatism, but showed predictable patterns of cross-trait coordination. Root diameter, cortex thickness and stele diameter displayed high variation across species (coefficient of variation (CV) = 0.51-0.69), whereas the stele: root diameter ratio and [N] showed low variation (CV < 0.32). Root diameter, cortex thickness and stele diameter showed a strong phylogenetic signal across species, whereas root branching traits did not, and these two sets of traits were segregated onto two nearly orthogonal (independent) principal component analysis (PCA) axes. Two major dimensions of root trait variation were found: a diameter-related dimension potentially integrating root construction, maintenance, and persistence with mycorrhizal colonization, and a branching architecture dimension expressing root plastic responses to the environment. These two dimensions may offer a promising path for better understanding root trait economics and root ecological strategies world-wide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据