4.6 Article

Herbivory and floral signaling: phenotypic plasticity and tradeoffs between reproduction and indirect defense

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 203, 期 1, 页码 257-266

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12783

关键词

floral volatile organic compound (VOC); glucosinolates; indirect defense; induced volatiles; parasitoid; plant defense; pollination; scent

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Funds (SNF/ESF) [31VL30_134416]
  2. CRN-Invavol grant
  3. European Union [281093]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31VL30_134416] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant defense against herbivores may compromise attraction of mutualists, yet information remains limited about the mechanisms underlying such signaling tradeoffs. Here, we investigated the effects of foliar herbivory by two herbivore species on defense compounds, floral signaling, pollinator and parasitoid attraction, and seed production. Herbivory generally reduced the quantity of many floral volatile organic compounds VOCs) in Brassica rapa. By contrast, floral color, flower diameter, and plant height remained unaffected. The decreased amounts of floral volatiles led to reduced attractiveness of flowers to pollinators, but increased the attractiveness of herbivore-infested plants to parasitoids. Plants infested with the native butterfly Pieris brassicae produced more flowers during early flowering, effectively compensating for the lower olfactory attractiveness. Herbivory by the invasive Spodoptera littoralis increased the amounts of glucobrassicanapin, and led to delayed flowering. These plants tended to attract fewer pollinators and to produce fewer seeds. Our study indicates a tradeoff between pollinator attraction and indirect defense (parasitoid attraction), which can be mitigated by reduced floral VOC emission and production of more early flowers. We suggest that this compensatory mechanism is specific to plant-herbivore associations with a coevolutionary history.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据