4.6 Article

Genome-wide association mapping for wood characteristics in Populus identifies an array of candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 200, 期 3, 页码 710-726

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12422

关键词

association genetics; cellulose; lignin; Populus; single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); wood traits; woodultrastructure

资金

  1. Genome British Columbia Applied Genomics Innovation Program [103BIO]
  2. Genome Canada Large-Scale Applied Research Project [168BIO]
  3. BioEnergy Science Center, a US DOE Bioenergy Research Facility
  4. Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Establishing links between phenotypes and molecular variants is of central importance to accelerate genetic improvement of economically important plant species. Our work represents the first genome-wide association study to the inherently complex and currently poorly understood genetic architecture of industrially relevant wood traits. Here, we employed an Illumina Infinium 34K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping array that generated 29233 high-quality SNPs in c. 3500 broad-based candidate genes within a population of 334 unrelated Populus trichocarpa individuals to establish genome-wide associations. The analysis revealed 141 significant SNPs (0.05) associated with 16 wood chemistry/ultrastructure traits, individually explaining 3-7% of the phenotypic variance. A large set of associations (41% of all hits) occurred in candidate genes preselected for their suggested a priori involvement with secondary growth. For example, an allelic variant in the FRA8 ortholog explained 21% of the total genetic variance in fiber length, when the trait's heritability estimate was considered. The remaining associations identified SNPs in genes not previously implicated in wood or secondary wall formation. Our findings provide unique insights into wood trait architecture and support efforts for population improvement based on desirable allelic variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据