4.6 Article

Reduced transpiration response to precipitation pulses precedes mortality in a pinon-juniper woodland subject to prolonged drought

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 200, 期 2, 页码 375-387

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12392

关键词

carbon starvation; die-off; hydraulic conductance; hydraulic failure; mixed effects model; semi-arid

资金

  1. Department of Energy's Office of Science (BER)
  2. National Science Foundation's Graduate Research Fellowship Program
  3. NIH at Rice University [NCI T32 CA096520]
  4. NSF [DEB 0620482]
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology [1232294] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global climate change is predicted to alter the intensity and duration of droughts, but the effects of changing precipitation patterns on vegetation mortality are difficult to predict. Our objective was to determine whether prolonged drought or above-average precipitation altered the capacity to respond to the individual precipitation pulses that drive productivity and survival. We analyzed 5yr of data from a rainfall manipulation experiment in pinon-juniper (Pinus edulis-Juniperus monosperma) woodland using mixed effects models of transpiration response to event size, antecedent soil moisture, and post-event vapor pressure deficit. Replicated treatments included irrigation, drought, ambient control and infrastructure control. Mortality was highest under drought, and the reduced post-pulse transpiration in the droughted trees that died was attributable to treatment effects beyond drier antecedent conditions and reduced event size. In particular, trees that died were nearly unresponsive to antecedent shallow soil moisture, suggesting reduced shallow absorbing root area. Irrigated trees showed an enhanced response to precipitation pulses. Prolonged drought initiates a downward spiral whereby trees are increasingly unable to utilize pulsed soil moisture. Thus, the additive effects of future, more frequent droughts may increase drought-related mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据