4.6 Review

Determining place and process: functional traits of ectomycorrhizal fungi that affect both community structure and ecosystem function

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 201, 期 2, 页码 433-439

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12538

关键词

community structure; ecosystem function; ectomycorrhizal fungi; effect trait; environment; functional trait; response trait

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation
  2. US Department of Agriculture
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. Department of Plant Science of the Pennsylvania State University, USA
  5. College of Life Sciences of Brigham Young University, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a growing interest amongst community ecologists in functional traits. Response traits determine membership in communities. Effect traits influence ecosystem function. One goal of community ecology is to predict the effect of environmental change on ecosystem function. Environmental change can directly and indirectly affect ecosystem function. Indirect effects are mediated through shifts in community structure. It is difficult to predict how environmental change will affect ecosystem function via the indirect route when the change in effect trait distribution is not predictable from the change in response trait distribution. When response traits function as effect traits, however, it becomes possible to predict the indirect effect of environmental change on ecosystem function. Here we illustrate four examples in which key attributes of ectomycorrhizal fungi function as both response and effect traits. While plant ecologists have discussed response and effect traits in the context of community structuring and ecosystem function, this approach has not been applied to ectomycorrhizal fungi. This is unfortunate because of the large effects of ectomycorrhizal fungi on ecosystem function. We hope to stimulate further research in this area in the hope of better predicting the ecosystem- and landscape-level effects of the fungi as influenced by changing environmental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据