4.6 Article

Evolution of a symbiotic receptor through gene duplications in the legume-rhizobium mutualism

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 201, 期 3, 页码 961-972

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12549

关键词

coevolution; duplication; legume-rhizobium symbiosis; lipo-chitooligosaccharides (LCOs); molecular evolution; neofunctionalization; Nod factors

资金

  1. Laboratory of Excellence ARBRE [ANR-2011-LABXARBRE-01]
  2. [NWO-VIDI-864.06.007]
  3. [ERC-2011-AdG-294790]
  4. [NWO-NSFC-846.11.005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The symbiosis between legumes and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia co-opted pre-existing end-omycorrhizal features. In particular, both symbionts release lipo-chitooligosaccharides (LCOs) that are recognized by LysM-type receptor kinases. We investigated the evolutionary history of rhizobial LCO receptor genes MtLYK3-LjNFR1 to gain insight into the evolutionary origin of the rhizobial symbiosis. We performed a phylogenetic analysis integrating gene copies from nonlegumes and legumes, including the non-nodulating, phylogenetically basal legume Cercis chinensis. Signatures of differentiation between copies were investigated through patterns of molecular evolution. We show that two rounds of duplication preceded the evolution of the rhizobial symbiosis in legumes. Molecular evolution patterns indicate that the resulting three paralogous gene copies experienced different selective constraints. In particular, one copy maintained the ancestral function, and another specialized into perception of rhizobial LCOs. It has been suggested that legume LCO receptors evolved from a putative ancestral defense-related chitin receptor through the acquisition of two kinase motifs. However, the phylogenetic analysis shows that these domains are actually ancestral, suggesting that this scenario is unlikely. Our study underlines the evolutionary significance of gene duplication and subsequent neo-functionalization in MtLYK3-LjNFR1 genes. We hypothesize that their ancestor was more likely a mycorrhizal LCO receptor, than a defense-related receptor kinase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据