4.6 Article

Physiological and metabolic consequences of autophagy deficiency for the management of nitrogen and protein resources in Arabidopsis leaves depending on nitrate availability

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 199, 期 3, 页码 683-694

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12307

关键词

aminopeptidase; carboxypeptidase; leaf senescence; nitrate availability; nitrogen remobilization; selective autophagy

资金

  1. FP6 Marie Curie fellowship [A02425]
  2. INRA
  3. Ministere de l'Education et de la Recherche
  4. Universite de Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy is present at a basal level in all plant tissues and is induced during leaf ageing and in response to nitrogen (N) starvation. Nitrogen remobilization from the rosette to the seeds is impaired in autophagy mutants. This report focuses on the role of autophagy in leaf N management and proteolysis during plant ageing. Metabolites, enzyme activities and protein contents were monitored in several autophagy-defective (atg) Arabidopsis mutants grown under low and high nitrate conditions. Results showed that carbon (C) and N statuses were affected in atg mutants before any senescence symptoms appeared. atg mutants accumulated larger amounts of ammonium, amino acids and proteins than wild type, and were depleted in sugars. Over-accumulation of proteins in atg mutants was selective and occurred despite higher endopeptidase and carboxypeptidase activities. Specific over-accumulation of the ribosomal proteins S6 and L13 subunits, and of catalase and glutamate dehydrogenase proteins was observed. atg mutants also accumulated peptides putatively identified as degradation products of the Rubisco large subunit and glutamine synthetase 2 (GS2). Incomplete chloroplast protein degradation resulting from autophagy defects could explain the higher N concentrations measured in atg rosettes and defects in N remobilization. It is concluded that autophagy controls C : N status and protein content in leaves of Arabidopsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据