4.6 Article

Complementary and dose-dependent action of AtCCS52A isoforms in endoreduplication and plant size control

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 198, 期 4, 页码 1049-1059

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12216

关键词

anaphase-promoting complex (APC); CDH1; cell size; endoreduplication; organ size

资金

  1. Conseil General de l'Essonne
  2. Marie Curie Early Stage Training Network ADOPT Grant [MEST-CT-2004-504066]
  3. European Molecular Biology Organization long-term fellowship
  4. Agence National de la Recherche [ANR-05-BLAN-0072-01]
  5. Hungarian Office for Research and Technology [OMFB-00441/2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dimension of organs depends on the number and the size of their component cells. Formation of polyploid cells by endoreduplication cycles is predominantly associated with increases in the cell size and implicated in organ growth. In plants, the CCS52A proteins play a major role in the switch from mitotic to endoreduplication cycles controlling thus the number of mitotic cells and the endoreduplication events in the differentiating cells. Arabidopsis has two CCS52A isoforms; AtCCS52A1 and AtCCS52A2. Here we focused on their roles in endoreduplication and cell size control during plant development. We demonstrate their complementary and dose-dependent actions that are dependent on their expression patterns. Moreover, the impact of CCS52A overexpression on organ size in transgenic plants was dependent on the expression level; while enhanced expression of the CCS52A genes positively correlated with the ploidy levels, organ sizes were negatively affected by strong overexpression whereas milder overexpression resulted in a significant increase in the organ sizes. Taken together, these finding support both complementary and dose-dependent actions for the Arabidopsis CCS52A isoforms in plant development and demonstrate that elevated ectopic CCS52A expression positively correlates with organ size, opening a route to higher biomass production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据